| Tel.: | (949) 458-9675 |
| Fax.: | (949) 458-9679 |
| E-mail: | info@quintlaw.com |
Quintilone & Associates Appellate Case Published: Jordan v. Superstar Sandcars
After litigating a case for over five years, the Attorneys at Quintilone & Associates, who represented the Defendant, successfully argued to have the trial court’s ruling upheld to dismiss a case pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 583.310, 583.360 mandatory five-year cutoff to bring a case to trial. The court of appeal held that it is the Plaintiffs’ obligation to monitor the case and keep track of relevant dates. Here the Plaintiffs refused to set the case for trial and waited almost a year after the cut off to even seek a trial date. The court ruled in favor of Defendants despite Plaintiffs’ argument that the five-year period was tolled for 12 weeks in 2004 when there was an official moratorium on civil trials in Riverside County. If you want to review the written decision the cite is: Jordan v. Superstar Sandcars (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 1416.
Tags :
New Analysis of the 2010 Employment Laws
It’s that time of year again. In this blog, Quintilone & Associates summarizes the new legislation enacted in 2009 that will impact employers and employees in the coming year.
SPACE
Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act (“GINA”)
SPACE
On November 21, 2009, the federal Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act (“GINA”) went into effect for employers. GINA elevates “genetic information” to a protected status under Title VII, the federal law that prohibits discrimination in the workplace. GINA creates yet another remedy for employees who have suffered discrimination on the basis of their genetic information and/or retaliation for asserting their rights under GINA. GINA was passed to ensure that employers would not deny costly employment and fringe benefits on the basis of the employee’s remote risk of illness.
SPACE
California law already prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of a person’s medical condition, including genetic characteristics. GINA broadens the protection to employees by prohibiting employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information about an employee or his/her family members, except under certain limited circumstances. As a result, employer-sponsored wellness programs that seek family medical history information in the course of risk assessments may implicate GINA. An example would be a company paid 24-Hour Fitness program that collects information. GINA also requires a modification of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) employer posting requirement. Go to eeoc.gov to view the current posters and print one and post it immediately.
SPACE
Employers should update their policies and make sure that their employees’ rights notices and postings are up to date. To comply with the substantive requirements of GINA, employers should train supervisors to avoid discussing medical issues with employees that may implicate GINA. Moreover, employers should review their wellness programs or contact Quintilone & Associates to ensure that they comply with GINA.
SPACE
Family and Medical Leave Act Amendments
SPACE
Employees who have family members serving in the armed forces now have expanded rights under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). In October 2009, federal legislation changed the definition of which service members are covered under the qualifying exigency category. Qualifying exigency leave allows an employee who is an active duty service member to take up to 12 weeks of leave per year to deal with specified issues related to overseas military service by a family member (defined as a spouse, son, daughter, or parent). Examples of qualifying leave include arranging for child care, making financial and legal arrangements, and counseling.
SPACE
Effective October 28, 2009, employees are now entitled to qualifying exigency leave when a family member who is in the regular armed forces is deployed to a foreign country. Previously, such leave was only available when a family member was called to active duty in the National Guard or military reserves. Similarly, qualifying exigency leave is now available when the employee’s family member is a member of the National Guard or military reserves and called to active duty in a foreign country. The requirement that service members be called to active duty “in a foreign country” replaces the former requirement that they be called to active duty “in support of a contingency operation.”
SPACE
In addition, federal legislation has also expanded the right of employees to take up to 26 weeks of leave per year to care for a family member with a serious injury or illness incurred as a result of military service. Under the new amendments, employees who have a family member (defined as a spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin) that is a veteran may now take such leave, as the veteran will be considered a “covered service member” so long as he or she was in active service during the five years previous to the date on which he or she needs care.
SPACE
Employers that are covered by the FMLA should (1) notify employees of the changes, and (2) revise their policies and procedures to ensure that they are in compliance with these new requirements.
SPACE
Remember, at the conclusion of FMLA or CFRA leave an employer must reinstate an employee at the same or an equivalent job, unless he or she is a “key employee” who is given appropriate notification. In order to be deemed equivalent, the alternative position must be virtually identical to the prior position in terms on pay (including pay increases), benefits and working conditions and involve substantially similar duties and responsibility. [29 CFR section 825.215(a)]
SPACE
Alternative Workweek Schedules
SPACE
On February 20, 2009, legislation was enacted to amend California Labor Code section 511 and provide slightly more flexibility surrounding alternative workweek schedules, though the process is just as confusing as before. The new law, Assembly Bill 5, recognizes that if an employer offers employees a “menu of options” for alternative workweek schedules, the options may include a regular eight-hour per day/five-day per week work schedule among the menu of options. The new law, which became effective on May 21, 2009, also provides that employees can move from one alternative workweek schedule option to another from week to week, with the employer’s consent.
SPACE
The new law also defines the term “work unit,” which was previously undefined in the Labor Code. To adopt an alternative workweek, two-thirds of the affected employees in a “readily identifiable work unit” must first vote to adopt the proposed schedule. The new law defines “work unit” to mean a division, a department, a job classification, a shift, a separate physical location, or a recognized subdivision thereof. A “work unit” may also consist of an individual employee as long as the criteria for an identifiable work unit are met. In addition, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement issued an opinion letter stating that under certain circumstances, an alternative workweek schedule may be in place for less than one full year—for example, during the summer months only.
SPACE
Employers who are considering amending their current schedule or proposing a new alternative workweek schedule should consult with Quintilone & Associates before scheduling a vote or implementing any new plan. These rules are very confusing and require strict adherence to the voting and notice provisions.
SPACE
Same-Sex, Out-of-State Marriages
SPACE
California generally recognizes out-of-state marriages to the extent that they are legal in the state where they were performed. In October 2009, despite Prop 8, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law Senate Bill 54, which accords valid out-of-state, same-sex marriages the same status as registered domestic partnerships. The new law becomes effective on January 1, 2010. However, the impact on employers is minimal; employers should continue to provide equal benefits to same-sex couples under California’s current domestic partnership law. For couples married out of state, including: Connecticut, Washington DC, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, Iowa, Wisconsin, Oregon, Washington and Nevada, employers should request a copy of the marriage certificate and verify that the same-sex marriage was legal when contracted.
SPACE
New Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification
SPACE
The U.S. Government issued a new Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, on August 7, 2009. The new Form I-9 contains an updated list of acceptable documents employees must present upon hiring, basically the Drivers License, Birth Certificate and Social Security Card. The new form also bears a note that all documents presented to establish identity and/or ability to work in the U.S. must not be expired. Employers must complete and retain a Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the United States and should immediately stop using all previous versions of the Form I-9. This new edition of the form is approved for use through August 31, 2012, and a copy of the new edition of the form can be found by clicking uscis.gov and then Forms and following the prompts. This means additional work for the Human Resources department.
SPACE
E-Verify Required for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors
SPACE
Subject to certain exceptions, employers that are federal contractors or subcontractors will now be required to begin using the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ E-Verify system to verify their employees’ eligibility to legally work in the United States. There is no charge to employers to use E-Verify and the process is fairly simple. Federal contracts awarded and solicitations issued after September 8, 2009, will include a clause committing government contractors to use E-Verify. The same clause will also be required in subcontracts over $3,000 for services or construction. Employers who are federal contractors or subcontractors should register for E-Verify by visiting e-verify.uscis.gov/enroll.
SPACE
Worker’s Compensation for Injuries by Third Persons
SPACE
California Assembly Bill 1093, effective January 1, 2010, sought to clarify the circumstances under which workers’ compensation will be paid where third persons cause the employee’s injury. The bill was introduced after a company’s insurer denied workers’ compensation death benefits to the family of a store clerk who was killed while on duty. The perpetrator had targeted her solely because she was African American; therefore, the insurer argued in an absolutely shameful manner, the death was caused by her race, not her employment. This law demonstrates how insurance companies view every situation as simply a cost benefit analysis. The new statutory language states that a workers’ compensation claim cannot be denied because an attacker’s motivation is related to an “immutable personal characteristic.” This has yet to be played out in other protected class status scenarios like mental disability, physical disability, or sexual orientation.
SPACE
Safety in Hospitals
SPACE
California passed Assembly Bill 1083, effective January 1, 2010, a new law designed to help ensure that patients and workers do not become victims of workplace violence. Existing law requires hospitals to conduct a security and safety assessment and, using the assessment, develop a security plan with measures to protect employees, patients, and visitors from aggressive or violent behavior. The new law, however, requires that hospitals review and update their plans annually. Employers who are required to comply with this new law should ensure that they are reviewing and updating the security and safety assessment and plan annually. While it’s not clear how a plan will actually save you, the Hospital will at least have to say they “have a plan” and now we “update it annually.”
SPACE
Safety in Educational Institutions
SPACE
California Senate Bill 188, effective January 1, 2010, is a new law that amends the California Code of Civil Procedure to allow postsecondary educational institutions to seek temporary restraining orders (“TRO”) and/or injunctions on behalf of a student. Institutions may seek TRO’s and/or injunctions where a student has suffered a credible threat of violence from any individual and only with the written consent of the student.
SPACE
This law has the enormous potential for abuse. This law allows postsecondary educational institutions to act as law enforcement and make decisions regarding the credibility of a threat. Logically, if you want to pass the class, you would always sign the “written consent” described. Existing law already allows any individual to obtain a TRO. While we all want to protect the safety of students and faculty, it is yet to be seen how this law will play out in universities across the state – where simple break ups result in TRO’s preventing one student or another from attending class.
SPACE
Civil Air Patrol Leave
SPACE
For those of us who employ more than 15 employees who are members of the Civil Air Patrol, employers will now be required to provide not less than 10 days of leave per year for voluntary members of the California Wing of the Civil Air Patrol in order for such volunteers to respond to an emergency operational mission under Assembly Bill 485, which takes effect on January 1, 2010. The California Wing of the Civil Air Patrol is a civilian auxiliary of the U.S. Air Force that augments the Air Force in search and rescue and disaster relief/disaster preparedness.
SPACE
Employers should conduct a survey to ensure compliance, then review their employee handbook policies and revise and republish the employee handbook, if necessary.
SPACE
Quintilone & Associates offers low costs solutions to up and coming buisnesses in need of a California employee handbook or simply a low cost revision of an existing handbook.
Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act (“GINA”)
On November 21, 2009, the federal Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act (“GINA”) went into effect for employers. GINA elevates “genetic information” to a protected status under Title VII, the federal law that prohibits discrimination in the workplace. GINA creates yet another remedy for employees who have suffered discrimination on the basis of their genetic information and/or retaliation for asserting their rights under GINA. GINA was passed to ensure that employers would not deny costly employment and fringe benefits on the basis of the employee’s remote risk of illness.
quintlaw.com
California law already prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of a person’s medical condition, including genetic characteristics. GINA broadens the protection to employees by prohibiting employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information about an employee or his/her family members, except under certain limited circumstances. As a result, employer-sponsored wellness programs that seek family medical history information in the course of risk assessments may implicate GINA. GINA also requires a modification of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) employer posting requirement. Go to eeoc.gov to view the current posters.
quintlaw.com
Employers, both large and small, should update their policies and make sure that their employees’ rights notices and postings are up to date. To comply with the substantive requirements of GINA, employers should train supervisors to avoid discussing medical issues with employees that may implicate GINA. Moreover, employers should review their wellness programs to ensure that they comply with GINA. Please contact Quintilone & Associates if you have any questions about the GINA and your business.
Tags : Employment Law Updates 2010, Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act, GINA
I am Working Overtime and Not Being Paid, Is There Anything I Can Do?
Whether or not you should be paid for overtime worked depends on whether or not you are an “exempt” employee or a “non-exempt” employee. Employees who are exempt, generally salary employees, do not get paid overtime. However, non-exempt employees should be paid for those hours worked.
Quintlaw.com
Under both federal and California law, exempt employees are salaried executives, administrative and professional employees. Under California law, these employees are exempt from both the minimum wage and overtime provisions. Under California Labor Code Section 515(a), to be exempt, you, as an employee must:
Quintlaw.com
- Be “primarily engaged in duties that meet the test of exemption;” and
- “Customarily and regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment in performing those duties;” and
- Earn “a monthly salary equivalent to no less than twice the state minimum wage for full-time employment.”
Quintlaw.com
If your employment does not meet all three of the aforementioned requirements, then you are a non-exempt employee and you should be paid for your overtime.
Quintlaw.com
In these tough economic times, management is cutting corners and trying to find ways to save money for their businesses. However, saving money by not paying you for the time you have worked is against the law.
Quintlaw.com
Whether or not you are an exempt or non-exempt employee requires careful legal analysis. The attorneys at Quintilone & Associates have ten years of experience in handling wage and hour actions against employers and can tell you if you are entitled to overtime pay. If you are not getting paid for the time you work, contact the attorneys at Quintilone & Associates at 949.458.9675 or req@quintlaw.com and kmw@quintlaw.com immediately.
Tags : california, exempt, overtime, wage and hour law
Welcome to Quintilone & Associates Blog
Welcome to the Quintilone & Associates blog.
Tags :







